Re: Pl/Java - next step?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Date: 2004-03-02 06:21:32
Message-ID: 20040302062132.GE496@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:14:09PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> > 1. Select Pl/Java_JNI.
> > 2. Select Pl/Java_remote
> > 3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics
> > 4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes
> > (controversial? Nah :-) )
>
> Option 5 (or 0) would be to use GCJ. This is likely to be the fastest
> and most lightweight solution, but perhaps not the most featureful.

Hm, last time I tried this it just SIGSEGV'd the backend after loading
libgcj.so or something like that. I didn't peek further because I feel
strange in Java land.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
La web junta la gente porque no importa que clase de mutante sexual seas,
tienes millones de posibles parejas. Pon "buscar gente que tengan sexo con
ciervos incendiánse", y el computador dirá "especifique el tipo de ciervo"
(Jason Alexander)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-02 06:45:02 Re: IN and ANY
Previous Message Dennis Bjorklund 2004-03-02 05:57:01 IN and ANY