From: | Tim Larson <tim(at)keow(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Date: | 2004-02-29 03:03:33 |
Message-ID: | 20040229030333.GD24612@keow.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:35:59AM +0100, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
> > Why GForge?
>
> GForge seems to be technically OK. But what about the future outlook. The home
> page lists 5 projects, whereof the 4 are tests. Are you sure they will not
> fold in a month or two, will they be reliable, responsive and real nice (the
> three r's) ?
http://gforge.org/ is not a hosting site, that is why you only found 4
test projects and the GForge project itself hosted on the site. The idea
is that you download the software and host it on your own hardware.
--Tim Larson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] | 2004-02-29 16:47:18 | Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET |
Previous Message | Kaare Rasmussen | 2004-02-29 01:35:59 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Larson | 2004-02-29 03:22:44 | Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-02-29 02:44:58 | Re: Enterprice support in PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] | 2004-02-29 16:47:18 | Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET |
Previous Message | Kaare Rasmussen | 2004-02-29 01:35:59 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2004-02-29 09:57:48 | jdbc.postgresql.org still configured to send .jars as text/plain |
Previous Message | Kaare Rasmussen | 2004-02-29 01:35:59 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal |