From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Date: | 2004-02-26 22:45:05 |
Message-ID: | 200402262345.05483.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I looked into that when core started discussing this whole
> thing awhile back. The Red Hat port of BZ to Postgres is perfectly
> usable.
Is it available anywhere?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:47:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:29:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:47:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:42:47 | Re: Tablespaces |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:47:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 22:42:47 | Re: Tablespaces |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-02-26 22:45:19 | Re: Upgraded Site..any news ? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-26 22:37:42 | Re: Upgraded Site..any news ? |