From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Date: | 2004-02-26 18:49:46 |
Message-ID: | 200402261049.46166.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
Robert,
> Josh, are you still in favor of this move if the larger community does
> not want to move the main project to a gforge based system? or vice
> versa?
Not sure. Depends on what the leads of the associated projects think.
Obviously, if everyone's dead set against it, we won't do it.
However, keep in mind that this is a proposal to *try* migrating to GForge.
We can reverse the process if we decide it's not worth it. That's why I'd
like to start with a few projects at a time.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2004-02-26 19:00:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-02-26 18:45:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-26 19:00:04 | Re: bgwriter never dies |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-02-26 18:45:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2004-02-26 19:00:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-02-26 18:45:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2004-02-26 19:00:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-02-26 18:45:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |