From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1083: Insert query reordering interacts badly with NEXTVAL()/CURRVAL() |
Date: | 2004-02-24 02:11:17 |
Message-ID: | 20040224021117.GA29715@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-sql |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 21:26:57 -0400,
PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Details:
>
> === SQL ===
>
> CREATE TEMP TABLE testing (col_a integer, col_b integer);
> CREATE TEMP SEQUENCE seq;
>
> /* this statement will produce the expected result */
> INSERT INTO testing (col_a, col_b) VALUES (NEXTVAL('seq'), CURRVAL('seq'));
>
> /* this statement will reverse the order of CURRVAL()/NEXTVAL() to match the
> column order of the table */
> INSERT INTO testing (col_b, col_a) VALUES (NEXTVAL('seq'), CURRVAL('seq'));
I don't think an order of evaluation is guarenteed for INSERT VALUE lists.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-24 05:37:47 | Re: BUG #1083: Insert query reordering interacts badly with NEXTVAL()/CURRVAL() |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-24 01:49:10 | Re: Crash when calling a pl/pgsql function with no row to pass as an argument |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-24 05:37:47 | Re: BUG #1083: Insert query reordering interacts badly with NEXTVAL()/CURRVAL() |
Previous Message | PostgreSQL Bugs List | 2004-02-24 01:26:57 | BUG #1083: Insert query reordering interacts badly with NEXTVAL()/CURRVAL() |