| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Lane Beneke" <lane(dot)b(at)smcinc(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement |
| Date: | 2004-02-20 20:32:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200402201232.54943.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Lane,
> So, here's my thought. How difficult would it be to build a server daemon
> that used PostgreSQL on the backend, and presented it to the network as a
> SQL Server compatible DB?
I think you're on the wrong list for this question. I take it you're
talking a compatibitily layer, like Rosetta?
I would think that writing a program to broker requests on port 1433 and
re-interpret SQL Server specific syntax would be a managable project for a
good C or Perl hacker. What would be difficult-to-impossible is:
1) making it scale & perform well (in my experience, MS SQL Server accessed
through Rosetta loses about 40% performance and is very limited in
scalability).
2) Making it integrate well with MS networking and the MS ODBC/OLEDB/ADO/.NET
clients.
Also, if you have T-SQL procedures, you would have to somehow implement T-SQL
for Postgres; translating the procedures is really not an option.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-02-20 20:41:06 | LinuxWorld Call for Papers - One Week Left (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2004-02-20 17:02:58 | Re: A dubious claim to fame ... |