| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration |
| Date: | 2004-02-20 20:19:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200402201219.57949.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave,
> Well, hang on. Why Gforge? Are there other solutions? If so then I think
> any voting/discussions/whatever should include the choice of new
> platform.
Do you have another proposal? Like I said, I'll be putting forward the case
for GForge; if there's another program you like, feel free to
counter-propose.
But I'm not gonna spend a bunch o' time reseaching other platforms when I
believe that GForge suits our needs.
> It's also normal to have the discussion before a vote rather than the
> other way round as you are proposing (unless I misunderstand what you've
> written), so that people can make a properly informed vote.
As if I could prevent discussion. My point is that this has been discussed,
off and on, on this list and elsewhere repeatedly without any action being
taken. I'm going to throw up a specific proposal for action, and if people
shoot it down, then so be it. But just to discuss the topic in general --
again -- is a recipe for paralysis.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-02-20 20:36:37 | Re: PDF docs in CVS broken |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-02-20 20:11:20 | Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration |