Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...
Date: 2004-02-18 19:52:20
Message-ID: 200402181952.i1IJqKV00955@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Larry Rosenman wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
>
>
> --On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 13:56:14 -0500 Bruce Momjian
> <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > The question is whether we should have a GUC variable to control no
> > waiting on locks or add NO WAIT to specific SQL commands.
> >
> > Does anyone want to vote _against_ the GUC idea for nowait locking. (We
> > already have two voting for such a variable.)
> >
> > If there is no one except Tom, we can continue.
> I'm with Tom. Playing with *ALL* locks is just asking for TROUBLE.

OK, seems folks want the NO WAIT to apply only to the requested lock,
and want syntax to show that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2004-02-18 20:05:47 Re: CHAR(n) always trims trailing spaces in 7.4
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-18 19:49:29 Re: NO WAIT ...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-18 21:42:14 Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-18 19:49:29 Re: NO WAIT ...