Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint

From: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Date: 2004-02-15 13:05:16
Message-ID: 20040215130516.GA5939@deneb.enyo.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Tom Lane wrote:

> You can only fsync one FD at a time (too bad ... if there were a
> multi-file-fsync API it'd solve the overspecified-write-ordering issue).

What about aio_fsync()?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-15 14:36:58 Re: [HACKERS] dollar quoting
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-02-15 12:53:50 Re: Renaming tables to other schemas

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-15 16:26:53 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Previous Message Claudio Natoli 2004-02-13 23:04:22 Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary