Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Date: 2004-02-14 05:01:31
Message-ID: 20040214050131.GA3594@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:11:08PM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> Size of the database is huge (e.g. every toll paid in New Jersey in the
> last 5 years)
> Available memory is huge (e.g. you buy a machine with 24 gigs of ram)
> Data bus bandwidth is huge (e.g. You buy an 8-way Opteron with 40 GB/sec
> bandwidth)
>
> The 32 bit machines cannot compete in these arenas.

I'm not supporting immense databases with this, but I am using 8- and
10- way UltraSPARC II boxes with 16 G of ram. I've been unable to
show a difference. There might _be_ one, mind, I just haven't shown
it.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2004-02-14 05:05:26 Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-02-14 04:18:42 Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium