From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |
Date: | 2004-02-14 05:01:31 |
Message-ID: | 20040214050131.GA3594@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:11:08PM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> Size of the database is huge (e.g. every toll paid in New Jersey in the
> last 5 years)
> Available memory is huge (e.g. you buy a machine with 24 gigs of ram)
> Data bus bandwidth is huge (e.g. You buy an 8-way Opteron with 40 GB/sec
> bandwidth)
>
> The 32 bit machines cannot compete in these arenas.
I'm not supporting immense databases with this, but I am using 8- and
10- way UltraSPARC II boxes with 16 G of ram. I've been unable to
show a difference. There might _be_ one, mind, I just haven't shown
it.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-02-14 05:05:26 | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-02-14 04:18:42 | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |