Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Delay feature

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Delay feature
Date: 2004-02-12 20:38:35
Message-ID: 200402122038.i1CKcZ206272@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Jan Wieck wrote:
> Attached is a corrected version that solves the query cancel problem by
> not napping any more and going full speed as soon as any signal is
> pending. If nobody objects, I'm going to commit this tomorrow.

Jan, three questions. First, is this useful now that we have the new
cache replacement code, second, do we need this many parameters (can't
any of them be autotuned), and third, what about documentation?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-02-12 20:42:01 Re: RFC: Query Planner making a distinction between Cross
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-02-12 20:22:28 Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Delay feature

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-12 23:52:08 Re: ANALYZE patch for review
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-12 20:30:46 Re: Updated win32 readdir patch