Re: Request for additional SPI functions.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Request for additional SPI functions.
Date: 2004-02-12 14:42:10
Message-ID: 200402121442.i1CEgAR14944@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> I will submit a patch. As soon as I have read the developers FAQ and learned
> how this is done :-)
>
> B.T.W. I needed one additional function. Do you think I should submit it
> too? This function copies some behavior found in the SPI_cursor_open. If
> submitted, I'd suggest that the SPI_cursor_open calls this method to verify
> the plan.

Sure, add that one too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-02-12 14:43:02 Re: How can I have 2 completely seperated databases in
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-02-12 14:26:28 Re: Transaction aborts on syntax error.