From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... |
Date: | 2004-02-09 18:11:33 |
Message-ID: | 20040209140849.I13061@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
"in private" (ie. when talking with someone, or on the mailing lists), use
of 'Postgres' or 'PgSQL' is widely used, but when dealing with a public
arena (ie. online polls, articles, etc), the formal name should be very
much encouraged and corrected ...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Joshua Drake wrote:
>
> > No. If it had been, I would have mentioned the source.
> >
> > I personally don't think it's worth bothering with.
>
> I would second this. Most people I know try to say PostgreSQL only until
> they install it, then call it Postgres. It is our own fault for having a
> difficult name for the software.
>
> If were up to me, we would change back to Postgres as it is even easier
> to say than MySQL (less syllables).
>
> I seriously doubt there is any confusion as to whether Postgres ==
> PostgreSQL.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
> >
>
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2004-02-09 18:11:58 | Re: BSDCan 2004 |
Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2004-02-09 17:57:12 | Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... |