| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: hanging for 30sec when checkpointing |
| Date: | 2004-02-07 17:00:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20040207170007.GA23916@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 10:56:57AM -0000, Peter Galbavy wrote:
> Nice to see old fashioned misinformation being spread around the place...
Do you care to clarify that remark? Because there's _plenty_ of
evidence that some IDE drives do not tell the truth about what
they're doing, and that SCSI has been, historically anyway, better at
dealing with parallel loads. This is because of the historical
design goals of the two different systems. Glib remarks about
misinformation are easy to make, but don't really help anyone make
decisions.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-02-07 22:16:02 | Re: Postgresql 7.4.1 and TCP/IP |
| Previous Message | Peter Georgi | 2004-02-07 14:41:51 | Postgresql 7.4.1 and TCP/IP |