From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: It's past time to redo the smgr API |
Date: | 2004-02-05 22:02:46 |
Message-ID: | 20040205220246.GA3470@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 04:55:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> > Another way to do it would be keeping the list of files to delete along
> > with the deleting Xid, but that would also require keeping a list of
> > which xacts aborted and which ones didn't.
>
> Really? When a subtransaction finishes, you either delete its files
> immediately (ie, if it aborted, you can drop files it created) or you
> reassign them as the responsibility of the parent (since any effects of
> the subtransaction really depend on whether the parent commits, you
> can't actually do its deletes yet).
Right, that's the mechanism I originally envisioned. (A similar one is
needed for deferred triggers, async notifies, heavy locks and on commit
actions.)
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Y dijo Dios: "Que sea Satanás, para que la gente no me culpe de todo a mí."
"Y que hayan abogados, para que la gente no culpe de todo a Satanás"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-02-05 22:43:23 | Re: It's past time to redo the smgr API |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-05 21:55:44 | Re: It's past time to redo the smgr API |