Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Right. And if we have sessionids we would want them logged there, I
> > think. And that would rule out anything based on xid or backend pid.
>
> Uh, what's wrong with backend pid? Since we fork before we start doing
> anything with a connection, it should surely be available soon enough
> for the connection log message.
>
> Larry's idea about combining PID and backend start time didn't sound too
> unreasonable to me.

Wow, like the idea too --- pid plus time_t start time of backend.
Actully, it would be good to have star time first so you can sort
everything in order of start time.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073