| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Beta freeze? (was Re: array surprising behavior) |
| Date: | 2004-02-04 22:57:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20040204225738.GA2269@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:06:29AM -0800, Joe Conway wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >I think this is most surprising behavior -- shouldn't the UPDATE raise
> >an error?
>
> Surprising, but not new (probably has been there back to the Berkley
> code), and has come up before on one of the lists (I think it might even
> have been pgsql-bugs).
Too bad :-(
> I'm still hoping to scrounge up the time to continue working on arrays
> for 7.5, including figuring out how to deal with this.
I have the same hope, though I know for sure that I won't have any time
to work on anything until March, and then I will probably devote most of
my time to Pg. When is beta freeze supposed to happen?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca" (Orual)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-04 23:28:59 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Kevin Brown | 2004-02-04 21:36:35 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint |