| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martin Marques <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
| Cc: | Stephen Robert Norris <srn(at)commsecure(dot)com(dot)au>, Manuel Tejada <mantemu(at)terra(dot)com(dot)pe>, Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: I can't upgrade to PostgreSQL 7.4 in RedHat 9.0 |
| Date: | 2004-02-02 17:47:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20040202174717.GB2985@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:04:49PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> El Lun 02 Feb 2004 11:59, Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> > But Fedora is very much a desktop linux distribution -- I wouldn't bet a
> > server on it.
>
> Why not? I don' t see much difference from other distributions, and at the
> end, if you want a real server you have to go through all the configuration
> to make sure it's going to have good performaces.
Fedora Core releases have too short a lifetime, by definition. You
don't want to be upgrading your servers every 6 months, do you? I'd
prefer something that gives me some more time before I have to consider
it obsolete. RHEL is a good example; I think they give you 3 years, 5
for RHAS (is this right?). Debian, Mandrake, FreeBSD o OpenBSD give me
a lot more confidence than FC because of this.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Si no sabes adonde vas, es muy probable que acabes en otra parte.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-02 18:02:44 | Re: Return Value of a Function |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-02-02 17:47:11 | Re: Return Value of a Function |