Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory
Date: 2004-02-01 21:58:42
Message-ID: 200402012158.i11Lwgm06369@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> BTW, does anyone want to lobby for renaming sort_mem at the same time?
> >> Since it's used for sizing hash tables as well as sort workspace, it's
> >> rather misnamed. I hesitate to rename it because of the potential for
> >> confusion though. People are pretty used to the existing name.
>
> > Hmmm ... maybe query_work_mem and maintenance_work_mem, or something
> > similar?
>
> I'll go with these unless someone has another proposal ...

The only confusion is that you can use multiple query_work_mem per
query, but I can't think of a better name.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message alban 2004-02-01 22:15:07 Re: SPI find backend id (novice)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-02-01 21:34:52 Re: ALTER SEQUENCE: Missing feature?