From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory |
Date: | 2004-02-01 21:58:42 |
Message-ID: | 200402012158.i11Lwgm06369@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> BTW, does anyone want to lobby for renaming sort_mem at the same time?
> >> Since it's used for sizing hash tables as well as sort workspace, it's
> >> rather misnamed. I hesitate to rename it because of the potential for
> >> confusion though. People are pretty used to the existing name.
>
> > Hmmm ... maybe query_work_mem and maintenance_work_mem, or something
> > similar?
>
> I'll go with these unless someone has another proposal ...
The only confusion is that you can use multiple query_work_mem per
query, but I can't think of a better name.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | alban | 2004-02-01 22:15:07 | Re: SPI find backend id (novice) |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-02-01 21:34:52 | Re: ALTER SEQUENCE: Missing feature? |