Re: Important OSCON update

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Important OSCON update
Date: 2004-01-30 22:55:32
Message-ID: 200401302255.i0UMtW224234@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > My feeling is that we had a reasonable number of PostgreSQL folks last
> > year, but not enough to justify dramatically expanding our conferences
> > slots this year. Now if this year has lots of attendees, we might have
> > more slots next year.
>
> Oh, I don't think that O'Reilly is being unfair; I counted total timeslots for
> the confence. I'm just dissappointed that some of our people won't get to
> go because their presentations will be alternates.

I was stating that more as a goal for people to attend. If they want
this to be a big PostgreSQL event, we have to get our people motivated
to attend.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-02 17:21:12 MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-01-30 22:46:24 Re: Important OSCON update