From: | Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za> |
---|---|
To: | pg-perform <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgres timeout. [SOLVED] |
Date: | 2004-01-28 10:47:22 |
Message-ID: | 20040128124722.78fe5dc0.svb@ucs.co.za |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance pgsql-sql |
Hi all,
It seems I always find a solution just after
panicking a little bit.
Anyway, I found that statement_timeout solved
my problem. When I tested it earlier, I actually
made an error, and skipped it as a possible
solution.
Cheers
Stef
Stef mentioned :
=> Forgot to mention that I use postgres 7.3.4
=>
=> Stef mentioned :
=> => Hi all ,
=> =>
=> => I'm trying to find out if there is a specific setting
=> => to make transactions time out faster in a scenario
=> => where there's an update on a table in a transaction
=> => block, and another update process tries to update
=> => the same column.
=> =>
=> => It looks like the second process will wait until you
=> => end the transaction block in the first transaction.
=> =>
=> => I've looked at the deadlock timeout parameter and
=> => other parameters, but I don't think I found what
=> => I'm looking for.
=> =>
=> => I basically need to be able to let the second process
=> => exit with an error after waiting 5 - 10 seconds.
=> =>
=> => Please can someone help?
=> =>
=> => Kind Regards
=> => Stefan
=> =>
=>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexandra Birch | 2004-01-28 11:23:38 | limit 1 and functional indexes |
Previous Message | Stef | 2004-01-28 10:12:17 | Re: postgres timeout. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexandra Birch | 2004-01-28 11:23:38 | limit 1 and functional indexes |
Previous Message | raingsey | 2004-01-28 10:12:19 | Help! Error with postgresql! |