From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |
Date: | 2004-01-23 20:50:56 |
Message-ID: | 20040123205056.GA12933@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:05:41AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/
Yes, I guess I shoulda thought of that, eh? Thanks. The docs do
suggest that there are some significant differences between the two
versions of the filesystem, so I'm not sure how sanguine I'd be about
the degree of "testing" the filesystem has received on Linux. On the
other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if it were no worse than the
other options.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-01-23 20:56:18 | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |
Previous Message | Karl Vogel | 2004-01-23 20:16:35 | Re: Linux Cluster File Systems |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-01-23 20:56:18 | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |
Previous Message | Karl Vogel | 2004-01-23 20:16:35 | Re: Linux Cluster File Systems |