Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Date: 2004-01-23 20:50:56
Message-ID: 20040123205056.GA12933@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-performance

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:05:41AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/

Yes, I guess I shoulda thought of that, eh? Thanks. The docs do
suggest that there are some significant differences between the two
versions of the filesystem, so I'm not sure how sanguine I'd be about
the degree of "testing" the filesystem has received on Linux. On the
other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if it were no worse than the
other options.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-01-23 20:56:18 Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Previous Message Karl Vogel 2004-01-23 20:16:35 Re: Linux Cluster File Systems

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-01-23 20:56:18 Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Previous Message Karl Vogel 2004-01-23 20:16:35 Re: Linux Cluster File Systems