From: | Richard Poole <richard(at)ruthie(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Left joins with multiple tables |
Date: | 2004-01-18 21:57:14 |
Message-ID: | 20040118215714.GA11708@guests.deus.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:30:01AM +0000, Colin Fox wrote:
> For each person in the people table, they may or may not have a record in
> a, may or may not have a record in b, and may or may not have a record in
> c.
...
> But I'd like to be able to do something like:
>
> select
> id, name, a.field1, b.field2, c.field3
> from
> people p left outer join a on a.person_id = p id,
> people p left outer join b on b.person_id = p.id,
> people p left outer join c on c.person_id = p.id;
You can just chain the joins and the Right Thing will happen:
SELECT id, name, a.field1, b.field2, c.field3
FROM
people p
LEFT OUTER JOIN a ON (p.id = a.person_id)
LEFT OUTER JOIN a ON (p.id = b.person_id)
LEFT OUTER JOIN a ON (p.id = c.person_id)
I'm not sure that this behaviour is mandated by the SQL standard;
a certain other popular open source database-like product interprets
the same construction differently. But it does do what you want in
postgres.
Richard
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vishal Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] | 2004-01-18 22:29:00 | Re: Trigger to identify which column(s) updated |
Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2004-01-18 13:02:43 | Re: Is it possible in PostgreSQL? |