| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] New PostgreSQL search resource |
| Date: | 2004-01-17 03:46:33 |
| Message-ID: | 200401162246.33928.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-www |
Ok, this is now the second site that has come to be in the last few days that
is using FTS and Tsearch for site search, and providing something that seems
a lot better than the search available on the main website... what is
stopping us from implementing this and dumping mnogosearch? at least for the
main site if not for the archives?
Robert Treat
On Friday 16 January 2004 19:33, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Took an hour today and made the 7.3.4, 7.4.1 and Practical PostgreSQL
> documentation
> all searchable using OpenFTS and Tsearch2. You can take a look at:
>
> http://www.commandprompt.com/community/
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua Drake
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-01-17 03:51:35 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] New PostgreSQL search resource |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-01-17 00:33:38 | New PostgreSQL search resource |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-01-17 03:51:35 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] New PostgreSQL search resource |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-01-17 01:51:26 | Re: Potential Problem with PostgeSQL performance on SuSE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-01-17 03:51:35 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] New PostgreSQL search resource |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-01-17 02:06:26 | Re: And now for an example of a different style of |