Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects?

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com>, David Teran <david(dot)teran(at)cluster9(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects?
Date: 2004-01-13 15:54:42
Message-ID: 200401131554.42850.dev@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday 13 January 2004 15:08, Jeff Eckermann wrote:
>
> I have been reading the PostgreSQL mailing lists for
> several years now, and have seen many bug reports.
> Few of these turn out to be actual bugs, usually they
> are due to error or misunderstanding by the user, or
> else hardware failures. In those few cases where the
> bugs are genuine, there is usually a patch released
> within hours of the report. Try and match that
> anywhere else.

And if you want read them too, the archive is publicly available at the
following URL:
http://www.postgresql.org/lists.html
You can see into our kitchens before sitting down to your meal...
Oh - another place to get a feel for what sort of bugs get found/fixed in a
live release, have a look in the online docs at the release notes.

The only bug that's bitten me was one where a backup/restore didn't set the
search_path correctly. It meant I had to intervene in a restore -
inconvenient, nothing more.

I think the most serious bug of recent times is probably the one fixed in
7.3.4 - search for server startup/WAL. As I recall, if some boundary
condition was met the server would refuse to start. I don't believe it caused
any damage to data.

PS - Jeff's right about the response time. For actual bugs, it's often
breathtakingly fast to get a patch.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Sidney-Woollett 2004-01-13 15:55:52 Re: Nested transaction workaround?
Previous Message Harry Jackson 2004-01-13 15:54:26 Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects?