Re: A cohesive sales message

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Rob Napier <rob(at)trafficofficemanager(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A cohesive sales message
Date: 2004-01-08 21:39:15
Message-ID: 20040108173643.V32294@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > IMHO, we have two camps here
> > ... one that is strong into "techno-advocacy", and the other into
> > "suit-advocacy" ... each "package" should be the culmination of that
> > groups work ...
>
> Who are these groups?

nothing so formal ... I'm just saying that we tend to have two focii on
this ... you tend to be more focused on the techno-advocacy, while I see
Josh more on the suit-advocacy side ... ack, I'm not trying to label
anyone in this, just that, with you and Josh as examples, altho its all
under "advocacy", there are ppl who tend to weigh heavier on one side or
the other ...

The end result is a mix, but it ensures that we haren't heavily lopsided
towards either ... make sense?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roderick A. Anderson 2004-01-08 22:06:09 Re: A cohesive sales message
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-08 21:30:51 Re: A cohesive sales message