Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf

From: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
Date: 2004-01-07 19:28:46
Message-ID: 20040107192845.GA25294@ping.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:58:54PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > [IP6] [Option Start] If the specified address family is AF_INET6 or
> > AF_UNSPEC, standard IPv6 text forms described in inet_ntop() are
> > valid. [Option End]

> I read it to mean that abbreviated forms (via inet_addr()) are OK for
> AF_INET but not for AF_INET6 (via inet_pton())

I guess I missed that that section is only about IPv6. So it
should use inet_addr()'s behaviour.

Kurt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2004-01-07 19:32:48 Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Kurt Roeckx 2004-01-07 19:23:40 Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf