From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] remove 'noversion' from standalone backend |
Date: | 2004-01-06 18:28:31 |
Message-ID: | 20040106182831.GA19199@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
(To hackers)
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:06:17PM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> P.S. BTW, how does everyone feel about the methodology I've been using
> for submitting and applying patches? The procedure I'm following is:
The only thing I'd like is that the applied patch is attached in the
automatic mail sent to pgsql-committers (or if people want to keep that
as a light traffic list, maybe another list could be created). This way
we could all easily see what's applied, as a whole, and learn from it.
This is not so much for your own patches because you also post them to
patches and that is enough for me, but for Tom's and other people's
patches.
IIRC somebody offered to do this not long ago ...
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"I think my standards have lowered enough that now I think 'good design'
is when the page doesn't irritate the living f*ck out of me." (JWZ)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-06 18:29:23 | Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-01-06 18:23:43 | Re: TODO list |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-06 18:29:23 | Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-01-06 18:13:16 | Re: minor smgr code cleanup |