Re: date validation problem

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael van Elst <mlelstv(at)serpens(dot)de>, Theodore Petrosky <tedpet5(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Sh A Guru Prasad <guru(at)ap(dot)nic(dot)in>, pgsql -bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: date validation problem
Date: 2004-01-05 08:53:40
Message-ID: 20040105085340.GB13231@zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 11:04:06AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael van Elst <mlelstv(at)serpens(dot)de> writes:
> > But there is no 55th month and no 66th day of that month,
> > the conversion should simply fail and abort the transaction
> > with an error, shouldn't it ?
>
> I believe this is an acknowledged bug in to_date, which Karel hasn't
> yet got around to fixing.

This feature/bug will probably removed/fixed in 7.5.

Karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PostgreSQL Bugs List 2004-01-05 11:53:49 BUG #1041: runtime error
Previous Message PostgreSQL Bugs List 2004-01-05 08:46:43 BUG #1040: runtime error