Re: WIP: Automatic view update rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bernd Helmle" <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Automatic view update rules
Date: 2008-11-13 18:50:47
Message-ID: 20040.1226602247@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> That seems like a deal-breaker to me... many users could easily be
> depending on views not being updateable. Views are generally always
> thought of as read-only, so you should need to explicitly mark a view
> as being updateable/insertable/deleteable.

The SQL standard says differently ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-11-13 18:53:01 Re: SQL5 budget
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-11-13 18:49:00 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard