Re: Surfacing qualifiers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Surfacing qualifiers
Date: 2008-03-26 14:40:18
Message-ID: 20037.1206542418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> David Fetter wrote:
>> Neil Conway sent me a patch that sketched out a plan to make quals
>> visible to functions

> er, what? Please explain what this means, why it might be useful.

It's utterly useless, because it only exposes a small fraction of the
information that would be needed to do anything.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-26 14:43:49 Re: Array behavior oddities
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-26 14:33:45 Re: pg_dump -i wording