From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | aspire420(at)hotpop(dot)com, pgsql-advocay(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ? |
Date: | 2003-12-30 21:54:47 |
Message-ID: | 20031230215447.GL48778@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 10:02:25AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> It seems to concern MySQL now at least. They have changed their minds on
> many enterprise features that PostgreSQL has for years. The strategy of
> misguiding people like "you don't need foreign keys", "you don't need
> stored procedures", "yadda yadda triggers", "blah blah views" didn't
> work forever. So they have to add or propose those features one by one.
Anyone have a copy of their older docs where they argued that row level
locking was bad and that you should only do table level locking? :)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Satrapa | 2003-12-30 23:46:39 | Re: Recommended Reading List (was Re: [GENERAL] |
Previous Message | Bret Busby | 2003-12-30 19:09:21 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is my MySQL Gaining ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-30 22:06:59 | Re: 'like' refuses to use an index??? |
Previous Message | Ericson Smith | 2003-12-30 21:44:36 | 7.4.1 RPMS |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ivan | 2003-12-30 22:35:11 | cache in plpgsql |
Previous Message | Bret Busby | 2003-12-30 19:09:21 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is my MySQL Gaining ? |