Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

From: "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com>
To: Christopher Murtagh <christopher(dot)murtagh(at)mcgill(dot)ca>, "Randal L(dot) Schwartz" <merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocay(at)postgresql(dot)org, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Date: 2003-12-27 18:31:11
Message-ID: 200312271031.11985.uwe@oss4u.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 27 December 2003 08:29 am, Christopher Murtagh wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2003, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > I've noticed a similar strategy in the PHP vs Perl dimension. PHP
> > started out being "simple and fast and easy to learn" by throwing off
> > all of the "complexities of Perl that weren't needed".
> >
> > Slowly and steadily, lagging about 3 to 10 years behind, PHP has
> > adding one-by-one all those "weird Perl features", but doing a poor
> > job of integrating them.
>
> Well, I hope that this doesn't parallel Postgres and MySQL, because
> it would spell doom for Postgres.
>
> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200311/apachemods.html
>
> Frankly, despite all it's weaknesses and inconsistencies, PHP *is* easier
> to use and faster to develop than Perl. At least this is what my
> experience has shown me and it seems that the survey above reflects the
> same thing.
>
> Since my experience with Postgres hasn't been that it is easier than
> MySQL (quite the opposite in fact), perhaps some work needs to be done to
> either dispel that myth, or to make sure that Postgres is easier to use
> (since I started with Postgres and learned MySQL afterwards).
>
> I know it sucks, but ease of use/simplicity goes a long way, often
> further than performance, features and stability.
>

The problem with "making it easy" is clearly visible with M$ products. Stupid
clicking makes it sooo easy and convenient that anyone with an IQ higher than
a coffee-maker thinks he's a "system administator" just because he can click
onto the contolpanel.
My point is, that postgres is a fully featured database and mysql isn't. There
is only a certain degree of "making it easy" in a complex environment. And
IMHO there should be a certain degree of complexity to handle the system,
otherwise every idiot will call himself database administrator and screw up
things really bad

UC

- --
Open Source Solutions 4U, LLC 2570 Fleetwood Drive
Phone: +1 650 872 2425 San Bruno, CA 94066
Cell: +1 650 302 2405 United States
Fax: +1 650 872 2417
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/7c/vjqGXBvRToM4RAuPMAKC7XdErDIma9Ey4GXqGnE4/ZVQPpwCeNx88
rZ3/Ji90E2cd2tTd9lySg3Y=
=s94v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gianni Mariani 2003-12-27 20:26:57 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Previous Message John Sidney-Woollett 2003-12-27 18:26:49 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Spraul 2003-12-27 19:03:10 Re: [PATCHES] update i386 spinlock for hyperthreading
Previous Message John Sidney-Woollett 2003-12-27 18:26:49 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ivan 2003-12-27 18:47:54 Re: new-line
Previous Message John Sidney-Woollett 2003-12-27 18:26:49 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?