From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, <btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas |
Date: | 2003-12-21 09:48:48 |
Message-ID: | 20031221174812.G2179-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> I think the original complaint was misguided and we should not do
> anything about it. IIRC the complaint amounted to "I have hundreds of
> schemas and it annoys me that \dn shows them all". How is this
> different from putting hundreds of tables into one schema and then being
> annoyed because \dt shows them all? We have other mechanisms available
> for making \dn selective (ie, you can use a name pattern). If \dn is
> restricted to showing only schemas in your search path, it will become
> useless.
I completely agree. It's like saying that \l should only show databases
you are currently connected to...
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-12-21 12:56:43 | Re: [GENERAL] Backwards index scan |
Previous Message | ezra epstein | 2003-12-21 08:14:24 | FEATURE REQUEST: let arrays support null values. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2003-12-21 15:07:39 | Re: psql \i handling ~ in specified file name |
Previous Message | Zach Irmen | 2003-12-21 08:22:49 | Re: psql \i handling ~ in specified file name |