From: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Dates BC. |
Date: | 2003-12-19 10:22:03 |
Message-ID: | 20031219102203.GE24721@zf.jcu.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:12:08AM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
> There is no zero calendar year. The first year of Anno Domini is 1. It's ordinal, not cardinal.
I agree. But the follow quoted code is not use in date_part() there
Kurt found bug. It's used in to_timestamp() _only_, and it works,
because tm2timestamp() and date2j() work with zero year.
> > Is there connection between formatting.c and date_part() ?
> > I don't think so...
> >
> > > In backend/utils/adt/formatting.c:
> > >
> > > if (tmfc.bc)
> > > {
> > > if (tm->tm_year > 0)
> > > tm->tm_year = -(tm->tm_year - 1);
... "tm->tm_year = -(tm->tm_year - 1)" is used for:
# select to_timestamp('0001/01/01 BC', 'YYYY/MM/DD AD');
to_timestamp
------------------------
0001-01-01 00:00:00 BC
and it's OK.
I think a bug is somewhere in timestamp2tm() which used in next
examples and it's shared between more functions:
# select to_char('0001-01-01 BC'::date, 'YYYY/MM/DD AD');
to_char
---------------
0000/01/01 AD
# SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR from '0001-01-01 BC'::date);
date_part
-----------
0
Karel
--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2003-12-19 12:07:57 | Re: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON 2004 |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2003-12-19 09:12:08 | Re: Dates BC. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-19 14:23:48 | Re: [GENERAL] restore error - language "plperlu" is not trusted |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2003-12-19 09:12:08 | Re: Dates BC. |