| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Outdated docs on techdocs |
| Date: | 2003-12-18 19:02:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20031218150206.O3016@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:31, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, David Fetter wrote:
> >
> > > I see we need to grasp a nettle here. How many versions can the
> > > community support? Even 7.3 is starting to look a little long in the
> > > tooth...
> >
> > If its a matter of existing docs for older versions, IMHO, unlimited ...
> >
>
> I think I'm parroting Marc here... if the text is already written, why
> not keep it around? We just need to clearly mark it as older
> information. If you want to write something new then as far as I am
> concerned you can write for the most recent brand new version and to
> heck with the older cruft :-)
Not sure the scope of the changes required, but would an appendum to
current text not be less confusing?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-12-18 19:06:56 | Re: Hello and some questions |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-12-18 18:07:29 | Re: Hello and some questions |