From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: My SGML build fixed |
Date: | 2003-12-18 00:15:12 |
Message-ID: | 200312180015.hBI0FCA26136@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > My 5-minute SGML build is now working again. The URL's are at
> > > > the bottom of the developers page.
> > >
> > > Why do we need two builds anyway?
> >
> > Good question --- historically, the SGML build on postgresql.org was
> > often broken, sometimes for months, and the build isn't frequent
> > enough for someone to commit an SGML change, then quickly view a new
> > build to see if errors were introduced.
>
> All of this has obviously not been true for a long time, so I repeat my
> question.
How often does the postgresql.org site build the SGML files? And just
last week the News build failed because it lost execution bits. I still
don't trust dynamic content on postgresql.org to work reliably.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jackson, Harold | 2003-12-18 02:44:06 | problem with getting return type mismatch from function |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-18 00:02:49 | Re: My SGML build fixed |