From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL][ADMIN]data fragmentation |
Date: | 2003-12-16 22:42:38 |
Message-ID: | 20031216224238.GG14503@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:29:20PM +0000, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 09:59:23AM +0530, Somasekhar Bangalore wrote:
> >>I too had the same problem; There was one query which used to take a
> >>very long time. What I did was, I took a backup of the whole database.
> >>Reinstalled postgres on a different mount point and restored the data
> >>back into the new database. Now my queries are running faster. Try it.
> >>All the very best.
> >
> >You could instead apply CLUSTER to the affected tables. (I'm assuming you
> >already apply VACUUM periodically and REINDEX as appropiate)
>
> What does CLUSTER does, and how can i use it?
Everything You Always Wanted To Know About CLUSTER
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/sql-cluster.html
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"El que vive para el futuro es un iluso, y el que vive para el pasado,
un imbécil" (Luis Adler, "Los tripulantes de la noche")
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-12-16 23:08:25 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-12-16 22:37:31 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |