Re: pljava revisited

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pljava revisited
Date: 2003-12-11 21:46:03
Message-ID: 200312112246.03945.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> libpq++ got heaved overboard largely
> because the autoconf burden for it was too high,

That's news to me. Certainly the overhead doesn't grow smaller by
splitting stuff up in smaller pieces.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-12-11 21:50:53 Re: pljava revisited
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2003-12-11 16:43:02 Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java?