Re: Multi column foreign keys.

From: Mofeed Shahin <mofeed(dot)shahin(at)dsto(dot)defence(dot)gov(dot)au>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multi column foreign keys.
Date: 2003-12-10 22:31:00
Message-ID: 200312110901.00049.mofeed.shahin@dsto.defence.gov.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:31 pm, you wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Mofeed Shahin wrote:
> > Some questions though:
> > When I do
> > DatabaseMetaData metaData = connection.getMetaData ();
> > ResultSet tableResultSet = metaData.getTables ("", null, null, new
> > String[]{"TABLE"})
> >
> > I'm actually getting alot more tables than I wanted. I seem to be getting
> > all the system tables, which I don't want.
>
> With 7.4 came the information_schema which I believe is what you are
> seeing. The attached patch should fix that.

Once again, thanks alot. That worked very well.

Will these patches be applied to the standard jdbc driver ?

> > I also get messages like :
> > "Column is_insertable_into in table views has unknown type code 1111"
>
> This message is probably from your own code after doing
> DatabaseMetaData.getColumns() on information_schema.views. The DATA_TYPE
> column is returning java.sql.Types.OTHER which you don't know how to
> handle. Perhaps we need to look at how domains are handled here and it
> should return the base type's code, but as this problem is in the
> information schema you shouldn't have to deal with in.

Right you are. Thanks.

Mof.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2003-12-11 01:47:13 Re: Multi column foreign keys.
Previous Message marcelospbr 2003-12-10 15:15:16 JDBC function call (getting resultset)