From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Somasekhar Bangalore <sbangalore(at)zensutra(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ganesan Kanavathy <ganesh(at)magnusquest(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Field Size |
Date: | 2003-12-08 15:35:52 |
Message-ID: | 20031208153552.GA5971@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-sql |
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 18:36:57 +0530,
Somasekhar Bangalore <sbangalore(at)zensutra(dot)com> wrote:
> There is no harm in having a field size of 1000 character provided u use the proper datatype. Don't user char(1000). Try using varchar(1000).
And if the 1000 limit is just a large number you picked rather than a
real rule for your data, then you probably want to use the TEXT type.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-12-08 21:15:50 | Re: Auto commit Off how will it effect us ? |
Previous Message | Andrei Bintintan | 2003-12-08 14:30:19 | Re: timestamp field |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | viola | 2003-12-08 23:23:07 | postgresql and ColdFusion |
Previous Message | Somasekhar Bangalore | 2003-12-08 13:06:57 | Re: Field Size |