Re: ecpg -e

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Lynn(dot)Tilby(at)asu(dot)edu
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ecpg -e
Date: 2003-12-08 09:02:09
Message-ID: 20031208090209.GA16063@feivel.fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 04:22:53PM -0700, Lynn(dot)Tilby(at)asu(dot)edu wrote:
> Yes, '-e' is the argument. I possibly could have upgraded the
> code without upgrading the docs....
>
> Here is the version output from ecpg...
> Let me know if this version of ecpg matches the 7.1.3 docs...
>
> [postgres(at)polaris bin]$ ecpg -V
> ecpg: invalid option -- V
> ecpg - the postgresql preprocessor, version: 2.8.0

Yes, this is the version that came with 7.1.3 AFAIRC. And yes, it
already had the option '-t' in the same function as today, but I cannot
find anything about an option '-e'.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gellert, Andre 2003-12-08 09:31:25 Where to find information about implementing full-text-search
Previous Message Thierry Missimilly 2003-12-08 08:58:07 Re: [ADMIN] Postrgres data restoration problem