Re: rebuilding rpm for RH9 error

From: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rebuilding rpm for RH9 error
Date: 2003-12-03 04:13:47
Message-ID: 200312022313.47870.lowen@pari.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 02 December 2003 06:29 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > You need to specify that you are building for Red Hat 9 on the command

> I'll try.

Ok.

> PS: the 7.4 will be remembered as the longest release to be developed
> and for the longest period needed in order to have the RPM for RH.

Not quite. The reason I got involved in this is the lag in getting 6.5 RPM's
way back when. As well as 6.4 and prior. Prior to 6.5 it would have been
possible to have six months between release of a tarball and release of an
RPM, usually by Red Hat itself.

I think I was slower with 7.1.x, but that was due to a different reason.

> Good job anyway.

Well, thanks, anyway.... :-) No, seriously, I must be doing ok if the longest
time to RPM release for the final release was just a week or so. That's not
too bad, really. But I do try to get closer to the release, and not farther.
And I will try to get 7.4.1 and 7.3.5 RPMs out sooner.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Natoli 2003-12-03 04:48:42 Re: [HACKERS] fork/exec problem: DynaHashCxt
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-12-03 04:12:24 7.3.5 bundled ...