From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: introduce "default_use_oids" |
Date: | 2003-12-01 23:17:53 |
Message-ID: | 200312012317.hB1NHri13739@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 05:07:40PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > > This patch adds a new GUC var, "default_use_oids", which follows the
> > > > proposal for eventually deprecating OIDs on user tables that I posted
> > > > earlier to pgsql-hackers. pg_dump now always specifies WITH OIDS or
> > > > WITHOUT OIDS when dumping a table. The documentation has been updated.
> > > >
> > > > Comments are welcome.
> >
> > Hum, sorry to be late, but wasn't one of the supposed strenghts of
> > pg_dump supposed to be that you could take a dump and load it on a
> > different RDBMS? I haven't tried it so I don't know if it works, but
> > this patch takes out the ability to do that -- no one else will accept
> > WITH/WITHOUT OIDS, so the dump will have to be modified. Is a switch
> > provided to stop the emission of those modifiers?
>
> I agree with that. By default, WITH/WITHOUT OIDS should not be dumped.
Yes, I see that now:
CREATE TABLE x (
y integer
) WITH OIDS;
We need a solution to this. One idea is to use SET to change the
default_with_oids setting when a table changes characteristics.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-12-01 23:28:41 | Re: introduce "default_use_oids" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-01 23:17:16 | Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions? |