From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Call from Info World |
Date: | 2003-12-01 02:58:20 |
Message-ID: | 200312010258.hB12wKq22782@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Christopher Browne wrote:
> Long and short of it all is that trying to define equivalents that can
> be summed up in one word is dangerous to the thinking process. It may
> be all that "Pointy Haired Bosses" can cope with, but the aftermath of
> the recent space shuttle disaster demonstrates that there's a true
> problem here.
If we want to efficiently communicate our value to businesses, we need
that "one word" explaination. Very few people have a longer attention
span than that --- you can say it isn't ideal, but it is true.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-01 04:10:09 | Re: [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions? |
Previous Message | Rick Morris | 2003-12-01 00:41:47 | Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments |