From: | Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gerwin Philippo <gerwin(at)vernet(dot)nl>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can I get rid of the schemas? |
Date: | 2003-11-29 17:30:59 |
Message-ID: | 20031129173059.51585.qmail@web20809.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
--- Gerwin Philippo <gerwin(at)vernet(dot)nl> wrote:
> In itself, the schema thing in version 7.4 is a good
> thing, but I'm
> migrating from a postgres/msacces combination in 7.2
> to 7.4, and I'm not to
> keen on every table in msacces appearing a
> public_<tablename>. Is there a
> way to avoid this?
I believe not.
"schema1.mytable" and "schema2.mytable" are entirely
separate entities, even though they have the same
name. How else could they be distinguished, if not by
the schema qualification?
If you link from Access to tables in any other DBMS
that supports schemas (e.g. MS SQL Server), you will
find the same thing.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | greg | 2003-11-29 17:40:52 | Re: CREATE SCHEMA $1? |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-29 17:24:22 | Re: PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc., was Re: PostgreSQL is much |