From: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
Subject: | Drop Cascade of Domains |
Date: | 2003-11-29 22:17:43 |
Message-ID: | 20031129141743.C6974@cookie.varlena.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have a table which contains three
columns of domain X.
If I drop the domain X with cascade,
the table remains with no columns.
Is this the proper behaviour?
It seems to me that any action which
results in an invalid object should be
forbidden. On the other hand, with
alter table working well, I am loathe
to argue a table with no columns is
an invalid argument.
Is there a previous rule on this issue?
--elein
============================================================
elein(at)varlena(dot)com Varlena, LLC www.varlena.com
PostgreSQL Consulting, Support & Training
PostgreSQL General Bits http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/
=============================================================
"Free your mind the rest will follow" -- En Vogue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2003-11-29 22:42:40 | Re: Cron-job for checking up on pg_autovacuum |
Previous Message | elein | 2003-11-29 22:11:20 | Domains and function |