Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC

From: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
To: "Sander Steffann" <steffann(at)nederland(dot)net>, "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Steve Wampler" <swampler(at)noao(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
Date: 2003-11-26 04:16:23
Message-ID: 200311252316.23510.lowen@pari.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday 25 November 2003 07:56 pm, Sander Steffann wrote:
> It turns out that preventing RH9 from building the debuginfo package also
> prevented it from stripping the binaries.

Ah, ok.

> This was what caused the big
> difference in filesize. I have rebuilt the RPMs for RH9 and put them on
> http://opensource.nederland.net/.

> I had to make a small modification to the specfile (again) because it seems
> that macro's work differently for each RPM / RedHat version. There have
> been no other changes to the sources or specfile, so the end-result is the
> same.

Ooo... yet more macro differences. Saturday I'll need to put some time into
understanding how to make a singular set...

> Sorry for the inconvenience I caused by disabling the debuginfo package!
> Sander.

Not a big problem.

I'll pull down the new packages tomorrow afternoon; I was going to be off, but
will have to come in for a couple of hours. So I'll transfer them across
then.

Many thanks!
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-11-26 04:18:21 Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-11-26 03:57:16 Re: performance versus order of fields in row