From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | shane hill <shill(at)adobe(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: design question: general db performance |
Date: | 2003-11-25 19:23:18 |
Message-ID: | 20031125142318.4ff8bdb2.threshar@torgo.978.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:42:47 -0800
shane hill <shill(at)adobe(dot)com> wrote:
> Our db is getting to be a respectable size (about 10GB right now) and
> is growing slower and slower. I have been charged with making it
> faster and with a smaller footprint while retaining all of the current
> functionality. here is one of my ideas. Please tell me if I am
> crazy:
>
What exactly is it getting slower doing?
Have you run through the usual gamut of things to check - shared
buffers, vacuum analyzig, etc. etc.
What ver of PG?
What OS?
Can you post any schema/queries?
Normalizing can help. But I don't think it is going to be a magical
bullet that will make the DB instantly fast. It will reduce the size of
it though.
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-11-25 19:27:39 | Re: design question: general db performance |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-11-25 19:19:25 | Re: [Fwd: Re: Optimize] |