From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Ganainm <paulsnewsgroups(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Comparing databases |
Date: | 2003-11-25 03:49:38 |
Message-ID: | 200311250349.hAP3ncN14061@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Paul Ganainm wrote:
> > A good example is our function language support. While most of the databases
> > above support some type of procedural language, do any of them support more
> > than 10 different types of procedural languages?
>
>
> Maybe this is a silly question, but do you really need more than 10?
> What's the matter with one that does a great job?
How are you going to obfuscate your app without using several languages?
SAP-DB used Pascal, Python, and C in the backend for reason. What job
security! (Ducks for cover.) :-)
> > I seem to recall reading that most of the firebird core developers all work
> > for the same commercial company, perhaps that is not true?
>
>
> Nope - I don't think so. There are a few who work for IBPhoenix, who
> consult on Interbase and Firebird and restore corrupted dbs &c., but
Man, we need to get us some of that "corruption" to boost consuting
fees! :-)
I just checked my Groff book and I don't see PostgreSQL mentioned in the
index. It is dated copyright 1999. Do you have a newer edition?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-25 05:40:00 | Re: PostgreSQL certifications? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-25 03:39:40 | Re: Comparing databases |